Skip to main content
· 3/14/2012

Commercial Bank, Inc. v. Raymond E. Lacy

Citations

  • 371 S.W.3d 121
  • 2012 WL 848866
  • 2012 Tenn. App. LEXIS 165

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that, “[b]ecause there is no dispute concerning the fact that [the defendant] failed to pay both promissory notes, . . . it is clear that [the plaintiff] is entitled to judgment as a matter of law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge J. Steven Stafford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.