Skip to main content
· 9/25/2003

Commerce Bancorp, Inc. v. BankAtlantic

Citations

  • 285 F. Supp. 2d 475
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16768
  • 2003 WL 22208756

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the lack of customer surveys and testimony supported a finding that the term did not acquire a secondary meaning in Florida
  • FLORIDA’S MOST CONVENIENT BANK and AMERICA’S MOST CONVENIENT BANK, used with house marks, are distinct and do not raise issue of fact regarding confusion
  • evidence of third party use supports finding that mark is not strong
  • finding no likelihood of confusion despite evidence of intentional copying

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Simandle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.