Commack v. Michigan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[p]roof of a civil conspiracy . . . exposes [a] defendant to joint and several liability for the victim’s losses” (citations omitted)
• stating that under New York law, proof of a civil conspiracy connects a defendant with the transaction, charges him with the acts of and declarations of his co-conspirators, and exposes that defendant to joint and several liability
• reviewing a district court’s decision whether to summarily enforce a settlement agreement for an abuse of discretion
• “[A] court may decide in its discretion to stay civil proceedings…when the interests of justice seem…to require such action.”
• “[A] court may decide in its discretion to stay civil proceedings…when the interests of justice seem…to require such action.”
• “The district court exercised sound discretion in staying the trial until the U.S. Attorney declined to prosecute . . .

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).