Comley v. Emanuel Lutheran Charity Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a doctor, who negligently treated a premature child, was not immune since his treatment decisions did not involve public policy concerns
• holding that a doctor, who negligently treated a premature child, was not immune since his treatment decisions did not involve public policy concerns
• holding doctor did not have immunity in suit alleging he committed various acts of medical negligence in treating a patient and stating that doctor’s alleged acts were not the exercise of governmental discretion because they did not involve decisions regarding public policy
• immunity may be raised in any pleading or motion appropriate for resolving legal issues

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).