Comidas Exquisitos, Inc. v. Carlos McGee's Mexican Cafe, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that “a likelihood of confusion is not required to support its claim under § 548.11.2”
• treating a similar counterclaim as one for malicious prosecution and dismissing
• court did not award defendant’s profits when no showing that any of defendant’s profit was in any way attributable to defendant’s use of plaintiffs service mark

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).