· 1/27/1989
Comex Clearing Ass'n ex rel. Peloso v. Flo-Arb Partners
Citations
- 711 F. Supp. 1169
- 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 837
- 1989 WL 40924
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “a different rate of compensation may well be set for different types of litigation tasks”
- “the court may adjust the lodestar figure upward or downward to take account of such factors as the * * * complexity of the litigation”
- which, unlike the instant case, involved determination of fees to a prevailing plaintiff where the policy considerations that govern the fee award differ from those applicable in the instance of a non-prevailing plaintiff
- although the fashioning of a back pay award falls within the trial court's sound discretion, that discretion should be exercised with a view toward fashioning the most complete relief possible
- decision whether to vary rate within trial court’s discretion
- factors include risk, complexity, and quality of representation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Duffy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.