Skip to main content
· 1/27/1989

Comex Clearing Ass'n ex rel. Peloso v. Flo-Arb Partners

Citations

  • 711 F. Supp. 1169
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 837
  • 1989 WL 40924

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “a different rate of compensation may well be set for different types of litigation tasks”
  • “the court may adjust the lodestar figure upward or downward to take account of such factors as the * * * complexity of the litigation”
  • which, unlike the instant case, involved determination of fees to a prevailing plaintiff where the policy considerations that govern the fee award differ from those applicable in the instance of a non-prevailing plaintiff
  • although the fashioning of a back pay award falls within the trial court's sound discretion, that discretion should be exercised with a view toward fashioning the most complete relief possible
  • decision whether to vary rate within trial court’s discretion
  • factors include risk, complexity, and quality of representation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duffy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.