Comer v. Gohil

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the plaintiff did not include sufficient postage for her proposed medical malpractice complaint, and by the time the plaintiff resent it, the statute of limitation had expired; this Court held that the plaintiff’s action was “time-barred”
• on appeal of a Rule 12(B)(8) dismissal, remanding with instructions to the trial court to permit amendment of a medical malpractice complaint where plaintiff could amend the complaint to avoid the statutory prerequisite to first present the complaint to the medical review board
• Clarified in memorandum decision on rehearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).