Skip to main content
· 4/24/1996

Comeaux v. National Tea Co.

Citations

  • 81 F.3d 42
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 9876
  • 1996 WL 164514

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “it is undisputed that [defendant’s] lighter fluid is subject to the FHSA and that [defendant’s] warnings fully complied with the FHSA and the regulations thereunder.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reavley, Garwood, Jolly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.