Comcast of Illinois X v. Multi-Vision Electronics, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting from deposition testimony that individual defendant “knew of the uses and features of the cable boxes [that the company] sold” and “was involved in setting company policy”
• “In federal question cases, the discovery rule applies in the absence of a contrary directive from Congress.”
• “Damages may not be determined by mere speculation or guess, but they may be subject to just and reasonable inference, although the result be only approximate.” (internal quotations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).