Skip to main content

Combs v. State

Citations

  • 351 So. 2d 1103

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that police officer hearsay testimony cannot be supported by other evidence of a burglary, it has to connect the defendant to the burglary
  • reversing an order of revocation where the only evidence connecting appellant to the burglary was the hearsay testimony by a police officer that another participant in the burglary had implicated appellant
  • reversing an order of revocation where the only evidence connecting appellant to the burglary was the hearsay testimony by a police officer that another participant in the burglary had implicated appellant
  • hearsay testimony of police officer insufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Letts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.