Combs v. Grigsby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the public interest factors did not weigh in favor of transfer because New Jersey law governed the plaintiff's claims, and a New Jersey federal court possesses greater familiarity with the applicable law than a Georgia federal court
• requiring companies that do business in New Jersey to defend here “works no serious inconvenience”
• finding it did not work a serious inconvenience for the defendants to defend their forum based activities in the district of New Jersey considering they conducted business in New Jersey
• “[Bjecause both Districts resolve relatively few cases by trial, the median time to disposition for all cases, not just trials, provides the more relevant measure of court congestion and speed to resolution of the average case.”
• “[B]ecause both Districts resolve relatively few cases by trial, the median time to disposition for all cases, not just trials, provides the more relevant measure of court congestion and speed to resolution of the average case.”
• “[B]ecause both Districts resolve relatively few cases by trial, the median time to disposition for all cases, not just trials, provides the more relevant measure of court congestion and speed to resolution of the average case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).