Combs v. Chevron, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that trial court lacked jurisdiction over unrelated claims that were first raised in motion for rehearing
• explaining that compliance with sections 111.104 and 111.105 of Tax Code creates trial court jurisdiction over tax refund claim
• holding no jurisdiction over tax refund claims because claimant failed to fulfill all of section 111.104’s administrative prerequisites to filing a tax refund suit
• “Chevron would (if possible) have gladly used the scaffolding without purchasing the attendant services. On the other hand, the attendant services would have been useless to Chevron without the ability to use the scaffolding to perform maintenance work.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).