Combs v. ATLANTA AUTO AUCTION, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff could pursue a negligence claim under OCGA § 51-1-6 based on the defendant’s alleged violation of certain zoning ordinances
• holding that a plaintiff could pursue a negligence claim under OCGA § 51-1- 6 based on the defendant’s alleged violation of certain zoning ordinances
• holding that accident would have occurred regardless of whether defendant violated ordinance
• theory of liability was foreclosed by failure to produce evidence of proximate cause
• although the plaintiff could not prevail as to a claim of negligence per se, a jury had to determine whether the defendant breached its “legal duty to exercise due care” “under the tort doctrine of premises liability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).