Skip to main content
· 4/22/1994

Combined Management, Inc. v. Superintendent of the Bureau of Insurance of the State of Maine

Citations

  • 22 F.3d 1
  • 18 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1208
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 8387
  • 1994 WL 135399

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an employee leasing company’s ERISA plan did not preempt state worker’s compensation statute
  • “[W]hen there is no prejudice and when fairness dictates, the strictures of the raise or waive rule may be relaxed.”
  • \[a]ny dispute arising between the parties hereunder shall come within the jurisdiction of the Greek courts\ does not provide for exclusive venue
  • “Because plaintiffs’ second Rule 59(e) motion to reconsider was . . . untimely (not served within 10 days of entry of the judgment), the district court was without jurisdiction to grant it.”
  • \Maine's workers' compensation law falls squarely within the dictates of Shaw.\
  • “Maine’s workers’ compensation law falls squarely within the dictates of Shaw.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Aldrich, Cyr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.