Com. v. Williams, N.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting the defendant simply “added his own notes and computer printouts to the file” and chastising the Commonwealth for supposedly relying on “mere supposition and speculation”
• “The homicide file is a ‘public record or thing,’ as contemplated by the statute, as it is kept by the government and is something that police officers are required to compile.”
• “That the second file was not included with the first is not evidence[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Williams, N.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-02-19

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. McBride
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-08-01· cited 135×
• Commonwealth v. Shelly
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-11-18· cited 35×
• Commonwealth v. Cherpes
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-01-20· cited 27×
• Clites v. Township of Upper Yoder
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-12-18· cited 12×
• Commonwealth v. Barger
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-06-29· cited 8×