Com. v. Seeney, T.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the CWA does not confer a privately enforceable right to \foster care maintenance payments\
• holding that the CWA does not confer a privately enforceable right to “foster care maintenance payments”
• holding that Title IV-E does not confer a privately enforceable right to foster care maintenance payments under Section 1983
• explaining that “[w]here the statutory language primarily concerns itself with commanding how states are to function within a federal program, the statute is less likely to have created an individually enforceable right”
• \Finding an enforceable right solely within a purely definitional section is antithetical to requiring unambiguous congressional intent.\
• finding the substantial compliance component of the CWA supports the denial of a private right of action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).