Com. v. Rubinosky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that equitable tolling may be appropriate where circumstances beyond the plaintiff’s control make it impossible to timely file a claim despite diligent efforts
• listing examples of extraordinary circumstances in cases where plaintiff was precluded from timely asserting claims such as closure of courts during wartime, unconstitutional law preventing filing, and plaintiff’s internment in prison camp
• bad faith tort claims accrue when plaintiff knew or should have known of injury and cause of injury
• \[The insurer is afforded wide latitude in its ability to investigate claims and to resist false or unfounded efforts to obtain funds.\
• \[T]he insurer is afforded wide latitude in its ability to investigate claims and to resist false or unfounded efforts to obtain funds.\
• “[A] representation of law is a statement of opinion as to what the law permits or prohibits, and cannot support an action for fraud.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).