Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 3/15/2024
Com. v. Rivera, H.
Citations
- 312 A.3d 366
- 2024 Pa. Super. 48
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that appellant’s discretionary aspects of sentencing challenge is waived where he fails to include a discretionary sentencing issue in his Rule 2119(f) statement, and the Commonwealth objects
- requiring appellant to preserve discretionary aspects of sentencing issue by raising it at the time of sentencing or in a post- sentence motion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beck
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. ButerbaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-05-13· cited 510×
- Commonwealth v. BakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-07-19· cited 309×
- Commonwealth v. KarnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-07-27· cited 102×
- Commonwealth, Aplt v. Koch, A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-12-30· cited 88×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-10-21· cited 68×
- Com. v. Derrickson, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-10-30· cited 64×
- Commonwealth v. SemenzaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-11-02· cited 20×
- Com. v. Gurung, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-09-17· cited 16×
- Com. v. Rivera, H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-03-15· cited 1×
Other cases named Com. v. Rivera, H.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.