Skip to main content

Com. v. Muhammad, R.

Citations

  • 289 A.3d 1078
  • 2023 Pa. Super. 6

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that an officer remains vulnerable at close range before an arrest is completed
  • interpreting Long to conclude that members of law enforcement properly restricted their protective search of the defendant’s vehicle “to those areas that [he] would have immediate control of and could contain a weapon”
  • acknowledging, in addition to the investigative detention, the mere encounter and custodial arrest
  • acknowledging, in addition to the investigative detention, the mere encounter and custodial arrest
  • “criminal defendants are already afforded protection against jury irrationality or error by independent review by our Courts of the sufficiency of the evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pellegrini, J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.