Com. v. Kress

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that termination of father’s rights must be reversed because the failure to hold a dispositional hearing after the adjudication deprived father of the opportunity to participate in treatment for twenty months
• noting that, by finding that no appropriate treatment plan can be devised, the court “avoid[s] the futility of proceeding with a treatment plan doomed to failure”
• “We reject policy considerations in favor of the plain language of a statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).