Com. v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that period between defendant’s arraignment and scheduled trial was excusable because the trial court determined the date assigned for trial was the earliest possible trial date

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Brooks
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-10-07· cited 203×
• Commonwealth v. Ramos
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-11-15· cited 163×
• Commonwealth v. Armstrong
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-07-31· cited 113×
• Commonwealth v. Cruz
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-05-17· cited 88×
• Commonwealth v. Fabian
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-01-11· cited 73×
• Commonwealth v. Williams
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-04-30· cited 30×