Com. v. J.J.B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that courts consider as factors “decreased production, business revenue, service, number of employees, payroll, or man-hours” (citation omitted)
• \[The legislature's acquiescence in [the] formerly consistent interpretation ... indicates that the legislature intended [the statute] to be interpreted under the majority rule.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).