Com. v. Haughwout

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that to hold that findings regarding the quantification of a water right are not entitled to preclusive effect would “undermine the stability and reliability of Colorado’s prior appropriation regime”
• explaining that to hold that findings regarding the quantification of a water right are not entitled to preclusive effect would \undermine the stability and reliability of Colorado's prior appropriation regime\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).