Skip to main content

Com. v. Harris, R.

Citations

  • 269 A.3d 534
  • 2022 Pa. Super. 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that binding precedential authority holds that jurisdiction attaches even though the Commonwealth could have opted to refile charges after an order granting a petition for habeas relief for want of evidence
  • reiterating that McClelland “preclude[s] the Commonwealth from relying on hearsay alone at a preliminary hearing to establish a prima facie case that the defendant committed a crime”
  • explaining “[a]s we often recognize, a prior published opinion issued by a panel of this Court constitutes binding - 27 - J-A21031-24 precedential authority”
  • “As we often recognize, a prior published opinion issued by a panel of this Court constitutes binding precedential authority.”
  • “a prior -9- J-A26008-22 published opinion issued by a panel of this Court constitutes binding precedential authority”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pellegrini, J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.