Com. v. Eid

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that economic loss rule barred negligence and negligent misrepresentation claims brought by subcontractor against engineering firm and inspector
• holding that negligent misrepresentation claim was barred under economic loss doctrine when the duty to report was contained in the parties’ contract
• holding that economic loss rule barred negligence claims because duty to perform in a non-negligent manner was provided for by contract
• holding that if a duty of care is memorialized in a contract, there is no independent contractual duty, and the economic loss rule bars the tort claim
• explaining that the economic loss doctrine applies where there is a series of interrelated contracts, even despite privity, because the parties have the ability to allocate risk
• noting the trend in Colorado and elsewhere to protect the ability of the parties to negotiate the allocation of risk and reward that is associated with a construction project

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).