Com. v. Dimatteo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the court of appeals should have declined to apply the law of the case doctrine to its own prior decision in the same case in light of significant developments in the law
• approving a jury instruction that said damages were recoverable if they “would probably be incurred” upon breach
• approving a jury instruction that said damages were recoverable if they “would probably be incurred” upon breach
• treating the willful and wanton conclusion as a finding of fact
• noneconomic damages are foreseeable in case alleging willful and wanton breach of automobile insurance contract by insurer
• an insured contracts with an insurer in part for peace of mind and security

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).