Com. v. Degounette

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff’s claim regarding misinformation about square footage fell outside the RPCDA because statute applies only when alleged “misinformation” relates to defects or matters listed in the statute
• holding that a plaintiff’s claim regarding misinformation about square footage fell outside the RPCDA because statute applies only when alleged “misinformation” relates to defects or matters listed in the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).