Skip to main content

Com. v. Davis, C.

Citations

  • 242 A.3d 923
  • 2020 Pa. Super. 270

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that MDJ lacked jurisdiction to issue convictions for summary offenses due to a failure to comply with the requirements of Pa.R.Crim.P. 542(F) and 543(F)
  • concluding that Davis’s “convictions constitute[d] a legal nullity and, as such, are unworthy of preclusive effect under the . . . principles of double jeopardy”
  • holding that Davis’s “convictions constitute[d] a legal nullity and, as such, are unworthy of preclusive effect under the compulsory joinder rule and the principles of double jeopardy”
  • holding that the term “issuing authority” refers to “a specific, individual MDJ”
  • deeming convictions a legal nullity where magisterial district judge lacked competent jurisdiction to transform the preliminary hearing into a summary trial
  • discussing a magisterial district judge’s powers under Rules 542 and 543

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Olson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.