Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 4/15/2024
Com. v. Balestier-Marrero, C.
Citations
- 314 A.3d 549
- 2024 Pa. Super. 71
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “appellate courts will not act as counsel and develop an argument for the appellant or scour the record to find evidence to support an argument”
- PCRA petitioner’s “bald claim” is waived because of insufficient analysis and/or lack of legal support
- PCRA petitioner’s “bald claim” is waived because of insufficient analysis and/or lack of legal support
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murray, J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-07-27· cited 4,184×
- Commonwealth v. FinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-10-31· cited 4,104×
- Commonwealth v. AlbrechtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-05-27· cited 770×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-02-06· cited 618×
- Commonwealth v. BlakeneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-12-29· cited 395×
- Commonwealth v. Spotz, M., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-10-18· cited 262×
- Commonwealth v. BeshoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-01-18· cited 183×
- Commonwealth v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-08-25· cited 181×
- Com. of Pa. v. DiazSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-03-23· cited 94×
- Com. v. Pridgen, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-10-24· cited 36×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.