Com. v. Artz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the criminal speedy trial statute and related law apply when considering whether a juvenile’s right to speedy trial has been violated
• holding that, “to give effect to all relevant statutory provisions,” a court must read section 19-2.5-904(1
• the defendant failed to establish that a sample taken from a horse’s back had apparent exculpatory value when it was destroyed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).