Com. v. Alvarado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that estoppel “cannot have created liability where none existed under the policy”
• viewing acts alleged as part of malpractice claim as separate acts of negligence
• excess insurance clauses were mutually repugnant, and insurers must apportion loss
• reversing appeals court's recognition of tort of wrongful life
• by implication in decision recognizing cause of action for pre-conception tort

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).