Com. v. Allah

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, alone, “[n]either the existence of blood nor of business relationship justifies a presumption of dishonesty”
• demand not futile where seven of the twelve directors in office at the time of filing had no part in the wrongdoing, even though one of the seven was the brother and another the employee of an accused wrongdoer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).