Com. v. Aikey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because neither seller nor his agent offered to return deposit, seller’s damages were limited to the deposit amount
• holding that because neither seller nor his agent offered to return deposit, seller's damages were limited to deposit amount
• stating that where the plaintiff had not offered to return the earnest money deposit, his damages were limited to the deposit
• affirming the grant of a motion to dismiss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).