Skip to main content
· 7/1/1999

COM. EX REL. UNIFIED JUD. SYS. v. Vartan

Citations

  • 733 A.2d 1258
  • 557 Pa. 390
  • 738 A.2d 1258
  • 1999 Pa. LEXIS 1893

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reflecting the view of a plurality of the Court that the privilege should be adopted
  • reflecting the view of a plurality of the Court that the privilege should be adopted
  • “The deliberative process privilege benefits the public, and not the officials who assert the privilege.”
  • courts do not sit in judgment on the motives of administrative officers
  • applying deliberative process privilege to judiciary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor, Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.