Skip to main content
· 1/31/1939

Com. Ex Rel. H. Franell v. Ashe, Warden

Citations

  • 3 A.2d 931
  • 134 Pa. Super. 96
  • 1939 Pa. Super. LEXIS 99

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • agreeing that “initial pro se pleading was insufficient . . . [because, among other things,] it was unclear from [that] pleading whether [the plaintiff] had complied with the FTCA’s notice requirements”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: PER CURIAM, January 31, 1939:

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.