Com. ex rel. Greene v. Gregg
Citations
- 161 Pa. 582
- 29 A. 297
- 1894 Pa. LEXIS 737
Syllabus
<p>Constitution — General appropriation bill — Prothonotary of Supreme Óourt.</p> <p>•' The general appropriation bill of 1893 appropriating a sum “ for the payment of the salary of a clerk in the offices of the prothonotaries of the Supreme Court,” etc., does not violate section 15, art. 3, of the Constitution, which provides that “the general appropriation bill shall embrace nothing but appropriations for the ordinary expenses of the executive, legislative and judicial departments of the commonwealth.”</p> <p>' The legislature is the exclusive judge of the form in which its enactments shall be put, and its mandate in that respect cannot be questioned unless it transgresses a plain prohibition of the constitution. ... In regard to the particular item under consideration, it appears to be intended to pay for a part of the regular and ordinary work of the offices named, and thei’efore to be for their ordinary expenses. It is a recognition by the legislature that the prothonotary cannot do the whole work of his office proprio manu, and an authority to him to have a portion of it done at the public cost. By Mr. Justice Mitchell.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that designating funds for Supreme Court prothonotary was permissible incidental language in a general appropriation act
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fell, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Sterrett, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-11-07· cited 252×
- Hospital & Healthsystem Ass'n v. Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-12-27· cited 60×
- Turnbull v. FinkSupreme Court of Delaware· 1995-10-26· cited 37×
- Sellers v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court· 1933-08-03· cited 33×
- State ex rel. Jones v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court· 1914-02-11· cited 21×
- Caldwell v. Board of Regents of University of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court· 1939-12-04· cited 16×
- Biles v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-07-17· cited 15×
- Adams County v. Commonwealth, Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-07-01· cited 7×
- Ortiz Reyes v. MacLeodSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1940-05-28· cited 6×
- Joseph B. Scarnati, Senator and President pro tempore of the Senate of PA v. Tom Wolf, Governor of PACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-12-30· cited 5×
- Renshaw v. Mayor of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1915-03-08· cited 4×
- El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Márquez CarriónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1943-05-18· cited 3×
- Hospital & Healthsystem Ass'n of Pennsylvania v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-07-23· cited 2×
- Burke v. ClarkPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1952-11-10· cited 1×
- Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. PA DHSCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-01-28
- Planned Parenthood of St. Louis Region v. Department of Social Services, Division of Medical ServicesSupreme Court of Missouri· 2020-06-30
- Power to Make General Appropriations For More than One Fiscal YearPennsylvania Department of Justice· 1966-01-25
- Commonwealth v. SloanPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas· 1971-03-17
- Commonwealth v. AsturinoWashington County Court of Quarter Sessions· 1924-07-01
- People v. Márquez CarriónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1943-05-18
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.