COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. Kline

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a deputy sheriff was authorized to enforce the Vehicle Code, through implementation of its implied consent provision, at a sobriety checkpoint
• observing that, per Leet, \deputy sheriffs have authority to make warrantless arrests for motor vehicle violations committed in their presence\
• reflecting the requirement that individuals must qualify as police officers under the Vehicle Code in order to lawfully enforce its provisions
• reflecting the requirement that individuals must qualify as police officers under the Vehicle Code in order to lawfully enforce its provisions
• reflecting the requirement that individuals must qualify as police officers under the Vehicle Code in order to lawfully enforce its provisions
• finding “that training other than Act 120 certification may be sufficient for purposes of Vehicle Code enforcement under our holding in Leet,” but not declaring what exact training is required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).