Skip to main content
· 2/26/1993

Com., Dept. of Transp. v. Boros

Citations

  • 620 A.2d 1139
  • 533 Pa. 214
  • 1993 Pa. LEXIS 53

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • intervening change in the facts of a case can moot a question on appeal
  • “An appellate court does not sit to review questions that were neither raised, tried, nor considered in the trial court.”
  • Commonwealth Court did not have the power to consider statute as an affirmative defense where defendant failed to rely on same
  • Commonwealth Court did not have the power to consider statute as an affirmative defense where defendant failed to rely on same
  • appellate court does not sit to review questions that were neither raised, tried, nor considered in the trial court
  • failure to raise issue below constitutes a waiver of that issue for purposes of appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala, Anos, Cappy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.