· 2/26/1993
Com., Dept. of Transp. v. Boros
Citations
- 620 A.2d 1139
- 533 Pa. 214
- 1993 Pa. LEXIS 53
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- intervening change in the facts of a case can moot a question on appeal
- “An appellate court does not sit to review questions that were neither raised, tried, nor considered in the trial court.”
- Commonwealth Court did not have the power to consider statute as an affirmative defense where defendant failed to rely on same
- Commonwealth Court did not have the power to consider statute as an affirmative defense where defendant failed to rely on same
- appellate court does not sit to review questions that were neither raised, tried, nor considered in the trial court
- failure to raise issue below constitutes a waiver of that issue for purposes of appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala, Anos, Cappy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.