Colwell v. Chernabaeff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• pre-ORCP decision, holding that the defendant’s pleading denominated “Notice,” which included a “motion to strike,” did not constitute “an ‘Answer’ or an appropriate appearance, which, under the circumstances, would prevent the taking of a default for want of an answer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).