Colvin v. Industrial Indemnity

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “a claimant may not avoid the notice requirements if the [employer] has clear procedures for reporting accidents and injuries and the employe knows or should know of and is able to follow the procedures, but does not”
• explaining proposes of notice requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Errand v. Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-02-02· cited 46×
• Vsetecka v. Safeway Stores, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2004-10-14· cited 45×
• Godfrey v. Fred Meyer Stores
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-11-23· cited 21×
• Argonaut Insurance v. Mock
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-01-25· cited 13×
• Keller v. SAIF Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-06-27· cited 8×
• SAIF Corp. v. Abbott
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-08-08· cited 8×
• Tri-Met, Inc. v. Odighizuwa
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-03-18· cited 4×
• Department of Consumer & Business Services v. Muliro
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-10· cited 3×
• Colvin v. Industrial Indemnity
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-12-17· cited 2×
• Golden West Homes v. Hammett
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-10-29· cited 1×
• Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Angus
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-06-01· cited 1×

Other cases named Colvin v. Industrial Indemnity

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Colvin v. Industrial Indemnity
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-12-17· cited 2×
• Colvin v. Industrial Indemnity
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-08-21· cited 2×