Colvin v. Hauenstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that Rule 27-A(a)(2) combines the requirement that the proposed class share at least one significant question of law or fact in common and the requirement that common issues predominate
• adopting unsustainable exercise of discretion standard for reviewing trial court’s decision on class certification
• “To ensure that the emotional injury is sufficiently serious to warrant legal protection and establish a cause of action, expert testimony is required to prove physical symptoms suffered from alleged negligent infliction of emotional distress.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).