Skip to main content
· 4/22/1985

Colville Confederated Tribes v. Boyd Walton, Jr., Et Ux

Citations

  • 752 F.2d 397

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the Court \may look to state law for guidance\ where federal law is not fully developed
  • holding the Court “may look to state law for guidance” where federal law is not fully developed
  • \[Tribal] reserved water rights are federal water rights and are not dependent upon state law or state procedures.\
  • “[Tribal] reserved water rights are federal water rights and are not dependent upon state law or state procedures.”
  • “This quantity of water, unrelated to irrigation, was not affected by the allotment of reservation lands and passage of title out of the Indians’ hands.” 26
  • federal law governs only scope and volume of reserved right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright, Sneed, Alar-Con

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.