Columbus v. Asomani

Citations

• 2017 Ohio 812

Syllabus

Municipal court retained subject-matter jurisdiction to convict and sentence appellant under former Columbus General Code 590.02(a)(3) and 599(a), and appellant did not demonstrate plain error where appellant's prosecution was pending at the time the charged ordinances were repealed and city counsel did not express an intent contrary to the city's general savings statute to enable the repeal to affect such pending prosecutions. Appellant's conviction was further supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed.