Columbus Pipe & Equipment Co. v. Sefansky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in action at law the question on appeal was whether \actionable fraud had been proven by the plaintiff by a preponderance of the evidence\
• in action at law the question on appeal was whether “actionable fraud had been proven by the plaintiff by a preponderance of the evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).