Skip to main content
· 12/14/1990

Columbus Mills, Inc. v. Doy L. Freeland, Raymond R. Lyon, and Margaret F. Lyon

Citations

  • 918 F.2d 1575
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 21558
  • 1990 WL 183565

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, in diversity cases, state law “controls both the questions of the availability of attorneys’ fees and the standards to determine when the attorneys’ fees should be awarded” and applying federal standards for determining reasonableness
  • affirming the district court’s decision not to reduce attorney’s fees for unsuccessful motions
  • “[T]he Norman Court left to the discretion of the district court the decision of whether to prune excessive hours”
  • “[T]he Norman Court left to the discretion of the district court the decision of whether to prune excessive hours”
  • “[T]he Norman Court left to the discretion of the district court the decision of whether to prune excessive hours”
  • “[T]he Norman Court left to the discretion of the district court the decision of whether to prune excessive hours”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fay, Johnson, Allgood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.