Skip to main content
· 11/6/2001

Columbus Clinic, P.C. v. Liss

Citations

  • 556 S.E.2d 215
  • 252 Ga. App. 559
  • 19 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1208
  • 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 3397
  • 2001 Ga. App. LEXIS 1272

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • issue of whether company breached employment agreement by terminating employee and not compensating him in accordance with the agreement was for the jury to resolve
  • “The intention with which an act itself is done is peculiarly a question for the jury.”
  • “The intention with which an act itself is done is peculiarly a question for the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Barnes, Phipps

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.