Columbus Clinic, P.C. v. Liss

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• issue of whether company breached employment agreement by terminating employee and not compensating him in accordance with the agreement was for the jury to resolve
• “The intention with which an act itself is done is peculiarly a question for the jury.”
• “The intention with which an act itself is done is peculiarly a question for the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Holcim (US), Inc. v. AMDG, INC.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-02-24· cited 35×
• Garrett v. Southern Health Corp. of Ellijay, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-03-08· cited 22×
• Green v. Eastland Homes, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-03-28· cited 8×
• Capital Health Management Group Inc. v. Hartley
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-12-30· cited 8×
• Nationwide Logistics, Inc. v. Condor Transport, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-11-01· cited 5×
• The Cupboard, LLC v. Sunshine Travel Center
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-09-06
• James P. Garrett v. Southern Health Corporation of Ellijay, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-03-08

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Deep Six, Inc. v. Abernathy
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-09-08· cited 69×
• Preferred Real Estate Equities, Inc. v. Housing Systems, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-03-23· cited 43×
• Tri-Cities Hospital Authority v. Sheats
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1981-06-23· cited 42×
• Tri-Cities Hospital Authority v. Sheats
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-10-07· cited 28×
• Johns v. Ridley
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-02-19· cited 10×