Columbus Bar Assn. v. Striff (Slip Opinion)
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 5285
Syllabus
Attorneys—Misconduct—Violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct and the Rules for the Government of the Bar, including knowingly making a false statement of fact to a tribunal, committing an illegal act that reflects adversely on the attorney's honesty or trustworthiness, and engaging in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice—Indefinite suspension.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Nothing in Section 3553(c) or our caselaw requires a district court to undertake a separate recitation of the basis for each part of the sentence imposed.”
- “Nothing in 15 Section 3553(c) or our caselaw requires a district court to undertake a separate recitation of the 16 basis for each part of the sentence imposed.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.