Skip to main content
· 2/28/1996

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Blankenship

Citations

  • 1996 Ohio 66
  • 74 Ohio St. 3d 586

Syllabus

Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Indefinite suspension—Neglect of an entrusted legal matter—Failure to carry out contract of employment—Causing prejudice or damage to a client—Attempt to exonerate or limit liability for malpractice—Failure to maintain client funds--Failure to pay and deliver client funds—Charging a clearly excessive fee—Engaging in conduct adversely reflecting on fitness to practice law—Engaging in conduct involving deceit or misrepresentation—Conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice—Neglecting or refusing to assist in disciplinary investigation.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.