Columbia Trust Co. v. Reccius

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the plaintiffs’ argument that they may assert an unjust enrichment claim in the alternative misunderstood defendant’s argument that a plausible contract claim did not exist rather than the existence of valid contracts
• finding a declaratory judgment claim appropriate where the plaintiffs did not already have “ripe claims for breach of express and implied warranties” and would otherwise “only qualify for declaratory relief” (emphasis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).