Skip to main content
· 1/9/1995

Columbia Steel Fabricators, Inc. Stevens Equipment Company v. Ahlstrom Recovery Aaro Kohonen Oy

Citations

  • 44 F.3d 800
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 225
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 403
  • 30 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1413
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 173

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming sua sponte grant of summary judgment in favor of non-appearing defendant because nonmoving party had opportunity to be heard on the issue as it applied to another defendant
  • affirming 7 district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of non-appearing defendant
  • “A [district [cjourt may properly on its own motion dismiss an action as to defendants who have not moved to dismiss where such defendants are in a position similar to that of moving defendants.”
  • “We have upheld dismissal with prejudice in favor of a party which had not yet appeared, on the basis of facts presented by other defendants which had appeared.”
  • “We have upheld dismissal with prejudice in favor of a party which had not yet 7 appeared, on the basis of facts presented by other defendants which had appeared”
  • applying collateral estoppel sua sponte

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canby, Hug, Kleinfeld

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.